https://www.jotform.com/?referral=iALMMVBeVE
Sunday, 8 June 2025
Tuesday, 10 September 2013
Obama seeks support for attacking Syria while pursuing diplomacy
Obama seeks support for attacking Syria while pursuing diplomacy
Obama: No boots on the ground in Syria
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
- Obama says to Congress and all Americans: watch the video of Syrian victims
- President Obama says time is needed to consider Russian proposal
- Syria's agreement to a Russian proposal changes the equation
- Obama says a continuing credible military threat is necessary
Calling the United States
"the anchor of global security," Obama offered moral, political and
strategic arguments for being ready to launch limited military strikes
while trying to negotiate a diplomatic solution to what he called
Syria's violation of a global ban on chemical weapons.
"Our ideals and
principles, as well as our national security, are at stake in Syria,
along with our leadership of a world where we seek to ensure that the
worst weapons will never be used," Obama said in making the case that
the United States must act when dictators such as Syrian President
Bashar al-Assad "brazenly" violate international treaties intended to
protect humanity.
The 15-minute nationally
televised speech initially was planned as Obama's final push to win
support from a skeptical public and Congress for his planned attack on
Syria for what his administration calls a major chemical weapons attack
on August 21 that killed more than 1,400 people in suburban Damascus.
New offer impacts Obama's challenge
However, Monday's
unexpected diplomatic overture by Russia changed the strategic and
political equation. Under the Russian plan, which still lacks any
details, Syria would turn over its chemical weapons stockpiles to
international control.
That would meet Obama's main criterion of ending the chemical weapons threat by the al-Assad regime.
However, Russia canceled a
U.N. Security Council meeting it had called for Tuesday and rejected an
initial proposal by France for the framework of a resolution, raising
questions about whether the diplomatic effort was serious or a stall
tactic to put off a U.S. attack on Syria.
For Obama, the Russian
proposal prompted by a seemingly off-the-cuff comment by U.S. Secretary
of State John Kerry further muddied an already complex challenge in
Syria compounded by public concerns of another possible military
quagmire.
The president called the
Russian offer an encouraging sign, but warned that "it's too early to
tell whether this offer will succeed, and any agreement must verify that
the Assad regime keeps its commitments."
Therefore, he said, he asked Congress to postpone a vote for now on authorizing military force against Syria.
In addition, the
diplomatic push will provide more time for United Nations inspectors to
report their findings on the August attack and allow his administration
to continue rallying support for an international response, the
president said.
Military to remain current posture
At the same time, Obama
said he ordered the U.S. military to maintain its "current posture to
keep the pressure on Assad and to be in a position to respond if
diplomacy fails."
Kerry made the same
argument at a congressional hearing Tuesday, telling legislators that
"nothing focuses the mind like the prospect of a hanging."
However, congressional support for military action reflected public opposition. A CNN/ORC International poll
released Monday said 59% of respondents opposed congressional
authorization of military action, while 72% said American strikes would
achieve no significant goals.
In an instant poll of people who watched the speech Tuesday night, 61% favored Obama's approach compared to 37% who opposed it.
The CNN/ORC
International survey showed almost two-thirds of respondents thought the
Syria situation would be resolved through diplomatic efforts, while 47%
said Obama made a convincing case for military action compared to 50%
who said he didn't.
By CNN's best estimate,
the sample of poll respondents -- 37% Democrats, 20% Republicans and 43%
independents -- was about seven percentage points more Democratic than
the general public.
Critics call the situation faced by Obama his own doing for a confused Syria policy that he has never fully explained.
"There's a degree of
incoherence that I have never seen the likes of," veteran Republican
Sen. John McCain of Arizona told CNN on Tuesday.
In the most emotional
part of the speech, Obama cited the videos his administration made
public that showed victims of the Syrian sarin gas attack.
"The images from this
massacre are sickening: men, women, children lying in rows, killed by
poison gas, others foaming at the mouth, gasping for breath, a father
clutching his dead children, imploring them to get up and walk," the
president said in emphasizing the horror of chemical weapons.
"The question now is
what the United States of America and the international community is
prepared to do about it, because what happened to those people -- to
those children -- is not only a violation of international law, it's
also a danger to our security," Obama added.
Directly addressing
questions he received from members of Congress and letters from the
public, the president insisted that any U.S. military strike would be
limited in scope and mission.
No American boots on the ground
"I know that after the
terrible toll of Iraq and Afghanistan, the idea of any military action
-- no matter how limited -- is not going to be popular," he said, later
declaring: "I will not put American boots on the ground in Syria. I will
not pursue an open-ended action like Iraq or Afghanistan. I will not
pursue a prolonged air campaign like Libya or Kosovo. This would be a
targeted strike to achieve a clear objective, deterring the use of
chemical weapons and degrading Assad's capabilities."
At the same time, he
rejected criticism that such a limited military response would prove
meaningless, saying "the United States military doesn't do pin pricks."
"Even a limited strike
will send a message to Assad that no other nation can deliver," Obama
said. "I don't think we should remove another dictator with force. We
learned from Iraq that doing so makes us responsible for all that comes
next. But a targeted strike can makes Assad -- or any other dictator --
think twice before using chemical weapons."
He described the U.S. role in the world as "doing more than forging international agreements; it has meant enforcing them."
"The burdens of
leadership are often heavy, but the world's a better place because we
have borne them," Obama said before making a direct appeal to both sides
of the political spectrum.
"To my friends on the
right, I ask you to reconcile your commitment to America's military
might with the failure to act when a cause is so plainly just," he said.
"To my friends on the left, I ask you to reconcile your belief in
freedom and dignity for all people with those images of children
writhing in pain and going still on a cold hospital floor, for sometimes
resolutions and statements of condemnation are simply not enough."
He concluded by
challenging "every member of Congress and those of you watching at home
tonight to view those videos of the attack, and then ask what kind of
world will we live in if the United States of America sees a dictator
brazenly violate international law with poison gas and we choose to look
the other way?"
McCain, Graham react
McCain and fellow GOP
Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina responded by saying Obama failed
to speak forcefully enough "about the need to increase our military
assistance to moderate opposition forces in Syria, such as the Free
Syrian Army."
They called for the
United States and its allies on the U.N. Security Council to
"immediately" offer a resolution "that lays out what steps Syria would
have to take to give up its chemical weapons, including making a full
and accurate declaration of all of its chemical weapons and granting
international monitors unfettered access to all sites in Syria that
possess these weapons."
"This resolution would
have to threaten serious consequences if the Assad regime does not
comply," they said, calling for an up-or-down vote by the Security
Council, where Syrian allies Russia and China have so far blocked any
U.N. action against Syria.
Rep. Elijah Cummings, a
Maryland Democrat and staunch Obama supporter who is undecided on Syria,
praised him for "a very good job" but said his position on the issue
remained unchanged.
"It was not a wasted
speech," said Cummings, noting his constituents are tired of war. "I
thought he made a great moral argument."
Obama's reluctance on Syria
For two years, Obama
resisted calls by conservative hawks such McCain to back rebels fighting
the al-Assad regime, saying the United States sought no role in the
Syrian civil war.
When evidence of
chemical weapons use emerged earlier this year, and Hezbollah fighters
from Lebanon helped al-Assad's forces gain the upper hand, Obama agreed
in June to provide military aid to the rebels.
The August attack
clearly crossed a "red line" he declared earlier against chemical
weapons use, prompting his decision for what he hoped would be an
international military response against Syria.
However, Britain's
Parliament voted against joining a military response, denying Obama a
normally reliable ally. He then decided to seek authorization from
Congress to provide political cover and buy time to build a broader
international coalition.
Now legislators from
both parties are threatening to oppose a resolution authorizing a
military response, and Obama has asked for time to let the diplomatic
process play out.
Kerry heads to Geneva on
Thursday for talks with his Russian counterpart, who first offered his
government's proposal Monday after Kerry earlier said Syria's turning
over its chemical weapons was the only way to avoid a U.S. attack.
Syria agreed Tuesday to the Russian proposal,
with Foreign Minister Walid Moallem saying his government was ready to
disclose the location of its chemical weapons, halt production, and show
its facilities to representatives of Russia, the United Nations, and
other unspecified states.
At the same time,
Russian President Vladimir Putin said Tuesday that "all of this will
only mean anything if the United States and other nations supporting it
tell us that they're giving up their plan to use force against Syria."
"You can't really ask
Syria, or any other country, to disarm unilaterally while military
action against it is being contemplated," Putin said in an interview
with a Russian television network.
Obama: Threat of strikes still critical
For his part, Obama
sought to persuade Americans of the opposite -- that the diplomatic
stirrings by Russia and Syria occurred because of the credible threat of
a military attack intended to deter Syria from using its chemical
weapons again.
The president has not said whether he would launch strikes without the support of Congress.
Meanwhile, a bipartisan
group of eight senators is working on an alternative resolution to the
one authorizing military action already passed by the Senate Foreign
Relations Committee. It would include "guidelines, reporting process and
benchmarks that have to be met," McCain told CNN.
On the House side,
Democratic Rep. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland said he was working on a
version of a resolution that would authorize a military response if the
diplomatic process failed to yield an acceptable result in 30 days.
The Obama administration
has launched a sweeping lobbying effort, with the president meeting on
Capitol Hill on Tuesday with senators from both parties as part of a
series of classified briefings, hearings and other consultations on the
Syria issue.
Since Friday, the
administration has spoken with at least 93 senators and more than 350
members of the House, a White House official said Tuesday.
Despite such outreach, indications were that the congressional push wasn't working.
Sen. Mitch McConnell,
the top-ranking Republican in the Senate, announced Tuesday he will vote
against authorizing military action on Syria.
So did Democratic Sen. Ed Markey of Massachusetts, who won the seat vacated by Kerry when he became secretary of state.
A running CNN vote count
showed most members of Congress remained undecided, with significant
opposition in both chambers among the much smaller numbers who have
announced their decision leaving the outcome in doubt.
Monday, 2 September 2013
George Clooney film opens Venice festival
George Clooney film opens Venice festival
George Clooney and Sandra Bullock sign autographs on the red carpet
Oscar-winning
actors George Clooney and Sandra Bullock have helped launch the 70th
Venice Film Festival with their 3D sci-fi thriller Gravity.
The Hollywood duo were joined by the film's Mexican director Alfonso Cuaron at Wednesday's world premiere.Shot in 3D, Gravity tells of two astronauts who are cast into deep space when debris destroys their shuttle.
Nicolas Cage, Matt Damon, Zac Efron and Scarlett Johansson are among the other stars expected over the next 10 days.
Italian director Bernardo Bertolucci heads this year's competition jury.
Star Wars actress Carrie Fisher and British film-maker Andrea Arnold are among those helping him decide which of the 20 titles in contention should win this year's Golden Lion award.
They include Terry Gilliam's dark fantasy The Zero Theorem, in which Damon appears alongside double Oscar-winner Christoph Waltz, and Johansson's Scotland-set sci-fi tale Under the Skin.
Joe, starring Cage as a violent ex-convict, is also in the competition line-up, as is Parkland, a historical drama set on the day President John F Kennedy was assassinated in 1963.
High School Musical star Efron forms part of its large ensemble cast, playing the doctor who examined JFK's body at the Dallas hospital that gives Peter Landesman's film its name.
For the first time, two documentaries are up for the Golden Lion: Errol Morris's The Unknown Known: The Life and Times of Donald Rumsfeld, and Sacro GRA, a film about Rome's ring road.
British hopes rest on Gilliam's film, Jonathan Glazer's Under the Skin and Philomena - Stephen Frears' fact-based film about an Irish woman, played by Dame Judi Dench, trying to locate the son she gave up for adoption in the 1950s.
George Clooney, Sandra Bullock and Alfonso Cuaron discuss Gravity
"This year's festival favourites pack a powerful punch," said a spokesman. "We predict Stray Dogs however to have just a bit more bite than the rest of the pack."
Special awards will be presented this year to US director William Friedkin, Polish filmmaker Andrzej Wajda and the Italian writer-director Ettore Scola.
Clooney, Bullock and Cuaron attended a press conference for their film on Wednesday before attending its gala screening at the festival's Palazzo del Cinema.
Early reviews were fulsome in their praise, with the Hollywood Reporter describing it as a "jaw-dropping space thriller" boasting "breath-catching tension and startling surprise".
Variety's reviewer echoed those sentiments, saluting "a nervy experiment in blockbuster minimalism" that "offers in abundance the sort of eye-popping, screen-filling spectacle that demands to be viewed in a [movie] theatre".
Vietnam internet restrictions come into effect
Vietnam internet restrictions come into effect
Vietnam has more than 30 million internet users
A controversial law banning Vietnamese online users from discussing current affairs has come into effect.
The decree, known as Decree 72, says blogs and social
websites should not be used to share news articles, but only personal
information.The law also requires foreign internet companies to keep their local servers inside Vietnam.
It has been criticised by internet companies and human rights groups, as well as the US government.
Vietnam is a one-party communist state and the authorities maintain a tight grip on the media.
Dozens of activists, including bloggers, have been convicted for anti-state activity in the country this year.
The new law specifies that social networking sites such as Twitter and Facebook should only be used "to provide and exchange personal information".
It also prohibits the online publication of material that "opposes" the Vietnamese government or "harms national security".
Last month the US embassy in Hanoi said it was "deeply concerned by the decree's provisions", arguing that "fundamental freedoms apply online just as they do offline".
Reporters Without Borders, a Paris-based group that campaigns for press freedom worldwide, has said the decree will leave Vietnamese people "permanently deprived of the independent and outspoken information that normally circulates in blogs and forums".
The Asia Internet Coalition, an industry group that represents companies including Google and Facebook, said the move would "stifle innovation and discourage businesses from operating in Vietnam".
Saturday, 24 August 2013
G Display phone screen offers 'highest resolution'
G Display phone screen offers 'highest resolution'
LG says the new screen shows crisper images and sharper text
LG has announced what it says is the highest resolution smartphone screen to date.
The 5.5in (14cm) component features 538 pixels per inch and supports 2560 by 1440 pixel video playback.That is higher than the 1080p high definition format, but less than 4K Ultra HD.
LG said the phone screen was also the slimmest available. However, analysts suggested consumers might struggle to appreciate the difference.
The South Korean firm's display division was the fourth biggest maker of screens used in phones and tablets in 2012 based on revenue, according to research firm NPD DisplaySearch.
Samsung sold the most, followed by Japan Display and Sharp.
LG said its latest technology would offer "more lifelike and crisp images" than what was already available on the market.
"The new Quad HD panel will enable users to enjoy a full view of PC-version web pages at a single glance without image distortion," it said.
"Also, even when enlarging the screen, users will be able to enjoy undistorted and sharper text."
China's Oppo was one of the first handsets to offer a screen capable of showing the 1080p HD resolution in full
Although the firm said it had taken steps to reduce power
consumption, one expert suggested using the tech would take its toll on a
phone's battery."There's only so much detail that a human eye can pick up in a 5.5in screen regardless of how many pixels you manage to cram into it," said Windsor Holden, from the tech consultants Juniper Research.
"Beyond a certain point there is a distinct law of diminishing returns. There's also the fact that the more pixels you have, the more work your graphics processor has to do.
"That has an impact on battery life, which is already being assaulted by a host of other applications throughout the day."
When the HTC J Butterfly and Oppo Find 5 handsets launched last year - the first to feature 5in screens offering 440ppi and "full HD 1080p" - reviewers suggest they did offer a noticeable improvement on what had come before.
However, tech research firm IHS Electronics & Media agreed that screen resolution might become less of a distinguishing factor in the future.
"LG Display will be targeting this screen at the premium market, so showing that it is pushing the technology is important to its business," said analyst Daniel Gleeson.
"But I think we're hitting the point at which consumers are going to focus on other issues when they decide which device to buy because so many handsets already feature a very high resolution."
China web users arrested over posts on Sina Weibo
China web users arrested over posts on Sina Weibo
Lei Feng, a soldier who died aged 22, is used as a model citizen in propaganda posters
Four people have been arrested in China over posts made on Twitter-like website Sina Weibo, state media has reported.
The users are said to have "incited dissatisfaction with the
government" by spreading rumours about a "hero" used in various
propaganda posters.Prosecutors said the group had been profiting from the activity.
The arrests come at a time when the Chinese authorities are seeking to reassert strict rules around public discourse.
"On one hand they know how popular this platform is, but they are also aware it can be a disruptive force," said BBCChinese.com editor Zhuang Chen.
"This is one of the main campaigns that the Chinese public security ministry is carrying out - to send out a clear message."
The arrested users were said to have spread rumours about Lei Feng, a deceased soldier who is often used as an example of the model Chinese citizen, a Communist Party devotee.
"Information that seriously harmed the image of Lei Feng was rapidly transmitted across the internet," the People's Daily reported, "and Lei Feng's glorious image was quickly brought into question."
Power users With almost 300 million users in the country, the social network is booming - even attracting famous names from outside of the country.
The likes of Robert Downey Jr, Paris Hilton and basketball star Kobe Bryant all have a presence on the site - although they are mostly there for marketing purposes rather than the more general discussion often found on Twitter.
Earlier this month, the government brought together some of Sina Weibo's most popular users to discuss their use of the platform.
The meeting, held at the headquarters of China's state TV network, set out seven key "minimums" for behaviour.
They included vaguely set standards for upholding the national interest, keeping with socialist values and maintaining public order.
Technology blog TechInAsia.com noted that the seven minimums appeared to be widely supported by the Sina Weibo community, but that some of the comments supporting them may have been posted by paid "opinion managers".
Friday, 9 August 2013
UK teen crowned world Microsoft Word 2007 champion
UK teen crowned world Microsoft Word 2007 champion
Kieran Youngman came out on top against 100 finalists in Washington DC
A student at Sawtry Community College in Cambridgeshire has become world champion at using Microsoft Word 2007.
Kieran Youngman, 17, beat more than 344,000 competitors from 90 countries to win $5,000 (£3,000) and a trophy.Exam-testing company Certiport set online challenges featuring the 2007 or 2010 versions of Microsoft Office programs Word, Excel and Powerpoint.
The best 100 contestants were invited to the final in Washington DC - next year's will be in Anaheim, California.
Mr Youngman said: "Career-wise I think it will show any employers I know how to use a Microsoft Office product
"There's no other way to prove you know exactly what you're talking about, without certification.
"Certification is validation you know what you're doing.
"With school, I'll be able to write reports and essays and stuff and make it a bit more fancy, to hopefully get a few extra marks."
Asked how his friends back in the UK would react, he said: "I'm going to be honest... a few might not be surprised."
Wednesday, 7 August 2013
Bionic fashion: Wearable tech that will turn man into machine by 2015
Bionic fashion: Wearable tech that will turn man into machine by 2015
HIDE CAPTION
Wear me out
Don't sweat it
Dirt Vader
Impact on the future
Sweet vibrations
Smokin' hot
Eyeing you up
What's your poison?
Sync your hearts
Heart-throb
Smize, baby
Fist-Bump your phone
Light me up!
Track it down
Shine on
Emotidress
Scentsual
Mirror, mirror on the wall
Climate control
Safety sock
<<
<
>
>>
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
- Two major conferences in the U.S. discuss the future of wearable technology
- Nano-tattoos, sleep optimization and augmented reality devices could become part of our daily lives
- Health and fitness monitors to play a large role in the future of wearable technologies
Editor's note: This week, two major conferences on wearable technology are taking place in the U.S. -- Wearable Technologies Conference in San Francisco and Wearable Tech Expo
in New York City. CNN spoke to keynote speakers from both events to
imagine how a day in the life of a wearable technology user might look
in the year 2015.
(CNN) -- 7:00am: You wake up to a
gentle vibration on your arm, you look down and see your wrist-mounted
Lark Pro alarm throbbing silently. It is 7 o'clock, Friday April 25,
2015 -- time to get up to go to work.
Lark Pro
is a vibrating alarm that allows people to slip out of bed quietly
without waking their partner. It also helps optimize sleep patterns by
waking you at the right moment in your sleep cycle. Sleep optimizing
technologies are designed to help insomniacs improve their resting
patterns by waking them during their lightest sleep phase. Monisha
Perkash, a wearable technology inventor, says she uses her wrist alarm
for this reason, to help "optimize my sleep schedule and track sleep
patterns so you know you have the best night's rest."
7:10am: Before
making breakfast you run your forearm across an ultraviolet reader on
your wall to check your glucose levels. Your "nano-tattoo" shines back a
reading that shows you are in the healthy blood-sugar range. As a
diabetic, you used to have to prick your finger and take a blood sample
to find out how your blood sugar was, but with the development of a
nano-tattoo you now simply have to place your invisible tattoo under an
ultraviolet reader.
The power of wearables comes from connecting our senses to sensors
Matt Miesnieks, CEO of Dekko
Matt Miesnieks, CEO of Dekko
Heather Clark, inventor
of nano-tattoos and an associate professor of pharmaceutical sciences in
Northeastern University's Bouvé College of Health Sciences in Boston,
explains that such technology "could be very user friendly, because once
the sensor 'tattoo' was inserted, it would be easy and painless to take
a reading using just light through the skin." Nano-tattoos are still a
long way off but Clark estimates that, if they do become commercially
available, they would be very cheap.
7:15am: Still half asleep you go downstairs to the kitchen and look through your cupboards for breakfast. Your Vuzix M100
assesses the nutritional value of each of the cereals on offer, and you
finally decide on a mixed grain muesli, which you hope will set you up
for the day with slow release energy.
You eat your breakfast with a HAPIspoon, which monitors your food intake to ensure you don't eat too quickly.
7:30am: After breakfast, you go u
Kick-Ass 2': Not your average sequel
'Kick-Ass 2': Not your average sequel
Jim Carrey, left, as Colonel Stars and Stripes and Aaron Taylor-Johnson as Kick-Ass in "Kick-Ass 2."
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
- "Kick-Ass 2" cast and director don't reveal too much about the film's actual plot
- Actors who portray Kick-Ass, Hit-Girl and Red Mist appear via satellite
- Drew Carrey withdrew his support from the movie because of its extreme violence
- "This is not a rinse-and-repeat sequel," says director-screenwriter Jeff Wadlow
Although Carrey -- who has withdrawn his support
for the film over the violence - was not on hand, Aaron Taylor-Johnson
(Kick-Ass), Christopher Mintz-Plasse (Red Mist) and
director-screenwriter Jeff Wadlow spoke with the convention-goers. Chloe
Grace Moretz, who plays fan favorite Hit-Girl, made a special
appearance via satellite to discuss her character's arc.
The cast and director
didn't reveal too much about the film's actual plot, although it was
clear from the footage that Hit-Girl's path takes her to high school and
deals with her issues following the death of her father (played by
Nicolas Cage) in the first "Kick-Ass" film.
"That was a big,
interesting arc that Jeff had the smart idea of putting in the movie,"
Moretz said. "Hit-Girl decides to give up her life of crime. She goes to
high school, and what she realizes is that whether it's a drug dealer
on the streets and a murder or a bad girl at school who is hating on
these kids, she has to bring justice to the situation. She realizes she
and Hit-Girl are the same person. It could also really touch young
teenagers, because it's what they're going through in school."
For Taylor-Johnson, the
sequel was an opportunity to pick up where he left off with his
character. The only major difference, he said, is that he has been doing
a lot of one-armed push-ups to bulk up this time around.
"It felt like a natural
progression," Taylor-Johnson said of the sequel. "For my character,
what's nice is that he hasn't changed at all since the first one. It's
always been a conversation about when are we going to do the second one.
I got a call from (producer) Matthew Vaughn saying, 'I've got someone
really great who's written a fantastic script and I'd like you to read
it and see what you think.' And it was a page-turner. He took these
characters through a wild journey that was really complex. It took these
characters to a whole new level."
Mintz-Plasse's character
takes on a much bigger role as the villain in this new film. Shooting
those scenes was intense for the actor, but he said he feels that the
journey his character takes is important to the story laid out both in
the graphic novel and the film. Red Mist, who lost his father as well in
"Kick-Ass," is reborn in this film as The Mother F----r, which should
give an indication of his qualities.
"I was really scared to
do something this intense and nerve-wracking, but Jeff (Wadlow) had a
great acting coach that came onboard," Mintz-Plasse said. "We worked for
a month prior to shooting and read every line and figured out what to
do for the character. I'm wearing a gimp outfit in this movie. It's
super dark. There's some things in the comic book that we took out,
which I think was a good choice. It was very intense to play."
"Kick-Ass 2" will be in
theaters on August 16, but fans are already wondering about a third
film. The writers of the graphic novel, Mark Millar and John Romita,
Jr., haven't actually completed a third book yet, however, and Wadlow
said he's not ready to focus beyond this sequel yet.
Bell: "Veronica Mars" could be my whole life
"Also," Wadlow
continued, "this is not a rinse-and-repeat sequel where we have the
characters just do the same thing again. We put them through a meat
grinder."
Michael Jackson's mom: 'I want to know what really happened'
Michael Jackson's mom: 'I want to know what really happened'
HIDE CAPTION
- Jackson matriarch Katherine Jackson: "A lot of the facts that have been said are not the truth"
- Michael Jackson's "not here to speak for himself," his mother says
- "My son was a very good person," Jackson's mother testifies
- Expert says Jackson would have earned $1.5 billion from touring and sponsorship
Katherine Jackson, likely
the final witness as her lawyers conclude their wrongful death case
against the pop icon's last concert promoter, began her testimony Friday
and will conclude it Monday in a Los Angeles court.
"The most difficult thing
is to sit here in the court and listen to all the bad things they say
about my son," Jackson testified.
The 83-year-old matriarch
of the world's most famous entertainment family sat on the front row in
the small courtroom for most of the 51 previous days of testimony.
"A lot of the facts that
have been said are not the truth," she said. She said contrary to what
an AEG Live executive wrote in an e-mail as Jackson prepared for his
comeback concerts in 2009, her son was not lazy.
But she especially
objected to an e-mail from AEG parent company's general counsel that
called Jackson "a freak" on the same day his company's top executives
were going to his house to sign the "This Is It" tour contract.
"He's not here to speak for himself," his mother said. She said she would "try my best" to speak for the pop icon.
Jurors leaned forward and
listened closely during Jackson's testimony and as her lawyer showed
them video of her son performing as a child.
The lawsuit filed by
Katherine Jackson and on behalf of the singer's three children contends
AEG Live is liable for the death of Jackson because it hired, retained
or supervised Dr. Conrad Murray. The doctor was convicted of involuntary
manslaughter.
AEG Live argues it was
Jackson, not their company, who chose and controlled Murray, who
admitted giving Jackson nightly infusions of a surgical anesthetic the
coroner ruled killed him. Its executives had no way of knowing about the
dangerous treatments Murray was giving Jackson in the privacy of his
bedroom, AEG Live lawyers contend.
"Why are you here?" Jackson lawyer Brian Panish asked Katherine
"Because I want to know what really happened to my son," she said. "And that's why I am here."
Panish asked Jackson how
it made her feel to have been asked probing and personal questions
about her family by AEG Live lawyer Marvin Putnam during a dozen hours
of deposition testimony.
"It makes me feel real
bad, because my son was a very good person," she said. "He loved
everybody, he gave to charity, he was in the Guinness Book of World
Records for giving to charity."
Putnam faces the challenge of not appearing unkind to Katherine Jackson while also trying to discredit her testimony.
"Forget it," she said as
she stopped before answering Putnam's question about why she initially
included, and later dropped show director Kenny Ortega as a defendant in
her lawsuit.
"Forget what ma'am?" Putnam asked.
Jackson remained silent for about a minute, staring back at Putnam.
Would it help to reread the question, he asked.
"No, it wouldn't be helpful," Jackson answered curtly.
The judge finally
ordered the question stricken from the record because the answer
involved privileged discussions with her lawyers.
Jackson returned to the
stand after the lunch break but she told the judge she was tired after
just a few more minutes of questioning by Putnam. The judge sent jurors
home two hours early and will allow Katherine Jackson to resume her
testimony Monday morning.
If jurors decide that
AEG Live is liable in Jackson's death, they could award damages based on
the loss of the mother's and children's relationship with him and the
amount of money he was unable to earn because his life was cut short.
The wrongful death trial is about to get a lot uglier, if defense lawyers live up to the promise of their opening statements.
AEG Live lawyers this
week brought up the child molestation charges against Jackson and the
2002 incident in which the pop star "dangled" his infant son on a Berlin
hotel balcony.
Touring till 66?
Paris Jackson made
another appearance in the trial this week -- via a video of her
deposition in March. Jurors saw a clip of AEG Live lawyer Putnam asking
the 15-year-old what her father told her about his "This Is It" tour:
Putnam: "Did he explain to you how long the tour was going to last?"
Paris: "I assume a long time since it was a world tour, but those usually last a long time"
Putnam: "How did you understand it was a world tour?"
Paris: "Because he told us."
Putnam: "What did he tell you?"
Paris: "That we were going around the world on tour."
Certified public
accountant Arthur Erk, who has managed and audited the business affairs
of many top artists, testified Wednesday that he is "reasonably certain"
that Jackson would have performed 260 shows around the world as part of
his "This Is It" tour. He would have earned $890 million over the three
years of concerts in Europe, Asia, South America, North America and
Australia, Erk said.
Jackson would have
earned at least $1.5 billion from touring, endorsements and sponsorships
had he not died preparing for his comeback tour, Erk said.
AEG Live's unprecedented
sellout of 50 shows scheduled for London's O2 Arena in 2009 and 2010
proved there was "pent-up demand" to see Jackson live, despite
controversies that had tarnished his reputation in the years since his
last tour in 1998, Erk said.
An e-mail from AEG Live
CEO Randy Phillips said fans bought all 750,000 tickets put on sale for
31 shows in March 2009 in just two hours. Enough buyers were registered
to sell out another 100 shows, Phillips wrote.
"Dude, we're going to
sell out a ridiculous amount of tickets," AEG Live Co-CEO Paul Gongaware
wrote in an e-mail. "We've got to get Mikey to add more shows."
Jackson's manager quickly approved another 19 shows, bringing the total to 50.
"Ten million tickets for the rest of the world? They would have gobbled up those tickets in seconds," Erk said.
AEG Live lawyer Sabrina
Strong challenged Erk's estimate, asking if any other act has ever made
as much money on a tour. "No," he said. "This would have been a
record-breaking world tour."
Jackson would have done another 195 shows over four more world tours before retiring from the road at age 66, Erk predicted.
Putnam called Erk's
estimates "a creation, a fabrication" which suggests Jackson would have
made more after age 50 that he did in the three tours during the "height
of his fame."
Jackson never intended to perform after the 50 shows in London, Putnam said.
AEG Live showed jurors a
video clip of Katherine Jackson's deposition, in which she said her son
would joke that he "didn't want to be moonwalking on stage at 50."
"Michael said that quite
a few years back and he was joking," his mother explained in her
testimony Friday. "I thought it was funny and most of us said things
like that. I used to think 50 was very old."
In fact, Jackson was 50
when he signed a three-year contract with AEG Live for his comeback
tour, which would have likely included his famous moonwalk dance steps
as he performed "Billie Jean."
"We announced that we're
going to have one tour in London, that's what was announced, and it was
called 'This Is It,' meaning in London, this show is it," he said.
"This show is it. This is the last thing he's ever going to do. As a
result of this being his final performance ever, to be at the O2 in
London, there was enormous response, understandably, and therefore we
sold 50 shows."
With the Jackson case
ending -- which Putnam called "ridiculous" -- "now we're going to start
to show what actually occurred here," he said.
No Conrad Murray testimony
AEG Live's defense team confirmed Wednesday that they would not be calling Murray to testify.
"I have no intention of
calling him myself, unless it's requested, your honor," Putnam said,
replying to the judge's question about his plans.
Until now, AEG Live
lawyers have suggested they might call Murray, who is serving a
four-year jail sentence for involuntary manslaughter, to the witness
stand.
Murray's lawyer gave the
Jackson and AEG Live lawyers a sworn statement from the doctor before
the trial began stating that he would invoke his constitutional
protection against self-incrimination by refusing to answer questions if
subpoenaed.
See you in September
Jurors, who were told
when the trial started in April that it could end sometime in August,
appeared unfazed when Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Yvette
Palazuelos told them this week that it is likely to extend into
mid-September. Putnam estimated this week that he needs about 30 days in
court to present his defense after the plaintiffs rest.
The jurors often have
laughed and smiled in reaction to testimony and the interplay between
Jackson lead lawyer Brian Panish, the judge and the AEG defense team.
For example, when
Palazuelos ordered Panish to turn around and face the bench while AEG
attorney Sabrina Strong cross-examined Erk, jurors seemed amused.
Panish, whose seat was just in front of Strong's lectern, had been
looking directly up at her at close range.
There were no laughs in
the hallway after court on Tuesday when Panish and Putnam exchanged
words. The two lawyers were standing about 15 feet apart, each talking
to reporters, when they began directing their words at each other. The
court clerk interrupted the heated conversation, threatening to summon
deputies.
Palazuelos lectured the
lawyers in her chambers the next morning and imposed new rules that bar
them from speaking to journalists in the hallway.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)